New Berlin - With its limited budget, the New Berlin Stormwater Utility has trouble keeping up with water-related complaints.
By the latest count, the city received 3,084 such complaints in 2010 for everything from yard or basement flooding to erosion, said Nicole Hewitt, city stormwater management engineer.
Because stormwater utility fees to homeowners and businesses are relatively low, the utility can only borrow $500,000 a year. And even that has to stop soon so that the fees can pay off what it has already borrowed.
So, the utility won't be able to do any major projects after 2014 so that the fees can pay down the debt on previous projects, Hewitt said. Homeowners contribute $60 per year toward the stormwater utility, which is charged with straightening out drainage and flooding problems that sometimes have devastating consequences to homeowners. Businesses pay more.
However, smaller projects will continue to be done because the Common Council funds them separately out of its capital budget. Each year the council has set aside $100,000 for drainage projects, with which the utility did more than 90 projects in 2010 and even more last year, Hewitt said.
The capital funding makes it possible for the utility to come to the aid of property owners with relatively serious flooding almost immediately.
But the backlog is two years for those whose flooding isn't that serious, Hewitt said. Those with drainage complaints that don't involve flooding can wait up to five years for help, Hewitt said.
Often the water problems are not the homeowners' fault. Development in other areas increases runoff that sometimes winds up flooding New Berlin basements and yards.
In fact, the often-severe flooding on parts of Meadow Lane and 124th Street might have resulted from the reconstruction of Greenfield Avenue and the construction of a shopping area in Brookfield, Hewitt said.
A study should get under way this year that could show that, she said.
E-mail Newsletter
Your link to the biggest stories in the suburbs delivered Thursday mornings.
Enter your e-mail address above and click "Sign Up Now!" to begin receiving your e-mail newsletter
Get the Newsletter!
More from News and Features
- Werner vacates Muskego alderman seat sooner than expected
- Share your thoughts on Act 10 with NOW using social media (26)
- News & Notes: May 15
- Ike students team up for academic success
- For West student, this camp is simply out of this world
- Muskego recall effort now limited to Werner's seat
- Police Report: May 14
- New Berlin man charged with sexually assaulting his granddaughter
- The trifecta of invasive plant species (2)
- News & Notes: May 7










9 COMMENTS
Stunned - Feb 06 at 11:12 AM - Report Abuse
ucrakmeup - Feb 06 at 9:41 PM - Report Abuse
Ahh, even if you outsource the work you still have to pay someone to do the work! Plus a "clerk" to manage the list and it maybe a good idea to have an inspector @ the jobsite to insure the work is done per the bid. A private business which pretty much has the same expense as the city, (sure less benefits) but depending on the cost of projects the owner will be forced to pay "prevailing wages" which can be much more then public employees make. Then factor in his ability to make profit , (possible salesmen) which now leaves you ahead how? What percent profit would be acceptable for a private business to make on a city funded job?Since the private company is paid by a city, should they disclose to the public where all the money goes for that project? Do you want transparency for your tax dollars being spent?
Stunned - Feb 08 at 8:22 AM - Report Abuse
ucrakmeup - Feb 08 at 9:55 AM - Report Abuse
Someone has to pay for maintenance and upgrades, it is never ending, regardless of who does the work.
Stunned - Feb 08 at 10:53 AM - Report Abuse
ucrakmeup - Feb 08 at 9:24 PM - Report Abuse
Busby - Feb 09 at 10:31 PM - Report Abuse
Stunned - Feb 10 at 7:51 AM - Report Abuse
ucrakmeup - Feb 10 at 10:46 AM - Report Abuse