NOW:53146:USA01489
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA01489
64°
H 68° L 37°
Clear | 12MPH
  • Print

There are plenty of worthy flood projects, but never enough money

Jan. 30, 2012 | 9 comments

New Berlin - With its limited budget, the New Berlin Stormwater Utility has trouble keeping up with water-related complaints.

By the latest count, the city received 3,084 such complaints in 2010 for everything from yard or basement flooding to erosion, said Nicole Hewitt, city stormwater management engineer.

Because stormwater utility fees to homeowners and businesses are relatively low, the utility can only borrow $500,000 a year. And even that has to stop soon so that the fees can pay off what it has already borrowed.

So, the utility won't be able to do any major projects after 2014 so that the fees can pay down the debt on previous projects, Hewitt said. Homeowners contribute $60 per year toward the stormwater utility, which is charged with straightening out drainage and flooding problems that sometimes have devastating consequences to homeowners. Businesses pay more.

However, smaller projects will continue to be done because the Common Council funds them separately out of its capital budget. Each year the council has set aside $100,000 for drainage projects, with which the utility did more than 90 projects in 2010 and even more last year, Hewitt said.

The capital funding makes it possible for the utility to come to the aid of property owners with relatively serious flooding almost immediately.

But the backlog is two years for those whose flooding isn't that serious, Hewitt said. Those with drainage complaints that don't involve flooding can wait up to five years for help, Hewitt said.

Often the water problems are not the homeowners' fault. Development in other areas increases runoff that sometimes winds up flooding New Berlin basements and yards.

In fact, the often-severe flooding on parts of Meadow Lane and 124th Street might have resulted from the reconstruction of Greenfield Avenue and the construction of a shopping area in Brookfield, Hewitt said.

A study should get under way this year that could show that, she said.

Welcome to our new commenting system.
  • You can register through your Facebook account, sign on with your Facebook password and use the same photo and screen name. If you don’t want your account tied to Facebook, you can keep your registration through our site.
  • You can now personalize your Journal Sentinel account with a photo even if the account is not tied to Facebook.
  • You can now reply to comments. Replies will be threaded to make conversations easier to follow.
  • You can continue to sort comments according to oldest first, newest first, and most thumbs up.
  • Your comments are archived on your own page.
  • Please notify us if you see personal insults or other irresponsible comments. We reserve the right to eliminate any comments and block any commenter who is not civil and respectful of others.

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Limit of 2000 characters, 2000 characters remaining

Sort by
Comment threads per page: 10 | 20 | 50 | 100
  1. This article should be titled "Stormwater Department wants to increase your fee." That is reallly the point isn't it? We all pay our $60 a year and it is never enough money? I would be willing to bet that most homeowners do not even complain about their water problems, until it gets more serious. This department does nothing more than manage a never ending list. Could the work be outsourced and just pay a clerk to manage the list?
    Hide replies
    • You see maintenance really never stops, things fail and need to be fixed, or replaced. And yes it sounds like many have complained. And yes $60 dollars may not be enough since the last time I checked nothing really has gone down in price from fuel, asphalt, concrete, gravel, trucks, digging equipment etc.
      Ahh, even if you outsource the work you still have to pay someone to do the work! Plus a "clerk" to manage the list and it maybe a good idea to have an inspector @ the jobsite to insure the work is done per the bid. A private business which pretty much has the same expense as the city, (sure less benefits) but depending on the cost of projects the owner will be forced to pay "prevailing wages" which can be much more then public employees make. Then factor in his ability to make profit , (possible salesmen) which now leaves you ahead how? What percent profit would be acceptable for a private business to make on a city funded job?Since the private company is paid by a city, should they disclose to the public where all the money goes for that project? Do you want transparency for your tax dollars being spent?
    • The 60 fee is city wide. It is not tax dollars, but you knew that. Most people call it their ditch tax and are not happy about even paying that. If you raise these fees and most do not see an impact for them, well then it is just another tax. What goes unsaid is that our tax dollard do go to stormwater and it is not the 100,000 that is stated in this article. It is in every road project that tax dollars do go too. So in essence the Stormwater is getting work done on everyones dime, and still charging the 60 fee. Again couldn't a consultant do this work?
    • How can I respond to someone that points out that the $60 fee is not a tax then goes ahead and calls it a tax anyway.,when you say "well then it's just another tax". then you go on to say"most do not see the impact".So what are you saying? If the easement by your house needs work charge them? What if that easment takes care of water from another municpality do you figure out every gallon af water and where it comes from , then charge those people? Good example is the Prospect pk. project. Look at the water shed, who do you charge and how much? Should ALd. Hopkins pay a ton more then others because he gets flooded most big rain falls? He would benefit from the work done and a few others. Should they just be reponsible? You have the problem with the fee, tell me how you would charge the appropriate people! By location? The direct imact the project has on your dwelling? The amount of water your dwelling sheds? Your location?
      Someone has to pay for maintenance and upgrades, it is never ending, regardless of who does the work.
    • I pay my 60. I have a problem paying more than that. We both know that more tax dollars go to stormwater than what is being stated. That is my point. Many people pay their fee and do not benefit from it. The point I am trying to make is that is there a more cost effective way of dealing with it. Has that been explored?
    • I think your wrong when you say no one benefits from $60 fee and other taxes used for storm water. Pretty much every road has some sort of storm water piping under it. When you drive on it and safely with NO sink hole that is because of a well maintained pipe. If you find a sink hole in the middle of the road it is because of a bad pipe, then the city comes removes pipe and replaces it with new. Now the pipe may be cheap but the equipment to do the job is not, also replacement asphalt , gravel and maybe a replacement basin. This all adds up and yes we all benefit from it. It is more then your grass ditchline. It is every waterway, storm sewer which is miles and miles worth, cross culvert, catch basin in the entire city that they are responsible for. $60 is not so bad when you look at the big picture. Hit a sink hole with your car and replace 1 tire what will that cost? So yes we all benefit on a daily basis. The trouble is when things are well maintained and you do not have a problem, you wonder where is my money going?
    • crak'd - the $60 doesn't go towards your construction example - guess what, there are other tax dollars already paying for that.
    • Thank you Busby! That was my point all along.
    • My point is WE all do benefit from good drainage big or small. I did mention in this post the fee and other taxes in my example. Since you want to split hairs and you have the problem with how it is funded, you guys give the idea how to pay for these projects, Lets use the prospect pkwy project since it is not complete and ald. Hopkins house still floods. Does he pay more because he benefits the most? Do you tell Brookfield residents they have to pay New Berlin? I beleive the project may exceed $1mil , how do you propose that is paid for????? You can complain but what is your solution?
Suburban News Roundup

E-mail Newsletter

Your link to the biggest stories in the suburbs delivered Thursday mornings.


Enter your e-mail address above and click "Sign Up Now!" to begin receiving your e-mail newsletter
Get the Newsletter!

Login or Register to manage all your newsletter preferences.

advertisement

Local Crime Map

CONNECT    

advertisement

Latest Photo Galleries